Moral turpitude (dishonesty), since this is relevant to their credibility. Witnesses may be asked if they have been convicted of a felony or a crime involving The attorney might do this by trying to show prejudice or bias in the witness, such as his or her relationship or friendship with one of the parties, or his or her interest in the outcome of the case. However, when a party calls a hostile witness, a witness who is unable or unwilling to respond to proper questioning, an adverse party, or a witness identified. Impeach in this sense means to question or reduce the credibility of the witness or evidence. (2) When a party calls a hostile witness, an adverse party, or a witness identified with an adverse party.
#Hostile witness rules of court trial
On cross-examination, the attorney might try to question the witness's ability to identify or recollect or try to impeach the witness or the evidence. 2), where the Court confirmed that the test that a trial judge is to apply is whether the ends of justice.
Hostile witness (a witness whose relationship to the lawyers client is such that his testimony is likely to be prejudicial) on direct examination, the lawyer can ask leading questions as on cross-examination. Another reason for allowing leading questions is that the witness is usually being questioned by the lawyer who did not originally call him or her, so it is likely that the witness will resist any suggestion that is not true.
Leading questions may be asked during cross-examination, since the purpose of cross-examination is to test the credibility of statements made during direct examination. Cross-examination is generally limited to questioning only on matters that were raised during direct examination. When the lawyer for the plaintiff or the government has finished questioning a witness, the lawyer for the defendant may then cross-examine the witness.
0 kommentar(er)
